9.11同時多発テロ事件と絶対的権限理論の「再興」 : アメリカ移民法を素材として

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks resulted in significant changes in the U.S. immigration law and policy. Six weeks later, Congress passed the USA Patriot Act to improve national security. Also in November 2002, Congress passed the Homeland Security Act, which abolished the Immigration and Naturalization Service and transferred most immigration functions to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Following the attacks, the U.S. Government carried out extensive investigations that targeted thousands of non-citizens, primarily from Arab and Muslim backgrounds. This article is at aiming to find how 9.11 terrorist attacks influenced the alien's right not to be removed from the United States without due process of law. First, Part I will demonstrate the relationship between the deportation system in immigration law and the alien enemies, introducing the Alien Enemy Act of 1798 and Ludecke v. Watkins the (1948) with historical views. Part II will introduce the 1996 immigration laws and the USA Patriot Act of 2001, criticizing the discriminative treatments of Arab and Muslim aliens by the Government. Part III will analyze Demore v. Kim (2003), Clark v. Martinez (2005), and Jama v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (2005) to examine whether the plenary power doctrine over immigration matters restored after 9.11 terrorist attacks in the U.S. immigration laws. Part IV will point out the Supreme Court's basic attitude regarding immigration and national security. Finally, this article concludes that the terrorist attacks restored the plenary power doctrine on immigration matters, but Supreme Court will continue to base their judgements strictly on past immigration case precedents, except in the case of alien terrorists. Also it suggests the role of justices in times of stress and the possibility of Japan to learn from the American case.

• 長崎外国語大学の論文

著者

• 新井 信之

  長崎外国語大学

関連論文

• 9.11同時多発テロ事件と絶対的権限理論の「再興」 : アメリカ移民法を素材として
• アメリカ移民法における自己保存原理の起源 : Chae Chan Ping v. United States判決の再検討
• アメリカにおける退去強制の概念と司法の判断
• アメリカにおける現行退去強制制度の概説(二・完)
• 国際家族の人権保障強化の可能性について : アメリカ判例理論を素材として
• アメリカにおける現行退去強制制度の概説(1)
• パキスタン憲法研究序説
• 町長発議の住民投票に関する憲法的考察--長崎県小長井町の事例を素材として
• 平和憲法存立の正当性と正統性について : 2000年憲法調査会の設置を契機として(個別報告,2002年秋季(第106回)大会)
• 外国人の退去強制と国家主権 : アメリカ連邦議会の絶対的権限とその法理について(分科会B(九州公法判例研究会),分科会,2004年(第109回)学術大会)

スポンサーリンク