総合政策学の認知体系 : 科学哲学・社会哲学各視野からの接近と総合化への構図(<特集>総合政策学)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Human-beings, either individually or collectively, plan to act on, for example, rational or irrational/emotional motivations with thier intentions in front of various problematic realities. Activities taken by them seek for coping facts to meanings, subjective (imaginative) to objective (in fact), symbolic to systematic, universal to partial, general or abstract to special or concrete, realistic to idealistic, asking for internal or external justification. So, in this paper, we cross over two axises, upward and downward with leftside and rightside, on each other of opponent and contrapositive concepts. By them we have quadrants of 4 dimention spaces opened or divided by each of conceptual antitheses along axises intersected at right angles to each other with center junction counterpointing contrastive face domains at the first stage of analyses. Overlaping each face at the second stage of syntheses and reflexivity, which is a overall combination course, we can get to some of conclusion as the result of generalization processes of epistemology. But we behave on the many stages of havitases having various degrees of uncertainty or risk and various roots of genealogy, possibilities of reaching same conclusions as consent or consensus are very scarce, and complex difficalty of them leads to many kinds of natures and types of societies. It is difficult, particularly, to reach each other consensus only by objectiveness or rationality, above all objective rationality criteria, set up on or started from the line like as public philosophy if standpoints of subjective side are neglected. Because it is too restrict and limited if relied only on one sided (it includes the third man's) objectiveness or rationality criteria. It is not always to be commonly held objectiveness or rationality, like that justice for one is injustice for others on the different position. To reach a stable consensus, we cannot avoid to step into each other's subjective areas, even if on the oneside supposed to be approved or opposed on the otherside. To consider others's subjective areas make clearer each other differencies of criteria and take easer next step to be adopted as mutual communication and ajustment, and so on. It is necessary for our open-ended future to be held our intersubjective relation with otherness and to step into other's psycological depthes adding to rational and objective consideration and understanding. This paper considers the generalization of policy studies, by summering the way of concept operations and related methodological ones from the standpoint of overview as at the last overall conclusion.
- 島根県立大学の論文