韓国の住宅性能表示制度に対する供給者の評価と課題

概要

論文の詳細を見る
This study has a purpose in driving meaningful ideas related to problems of the institutions and their assignments, as well as clarifying the actual conditions, by paying attention that the Housing Performance Grade Indication System of Korea has been enforced to a supplier as a duty. After we selected several construction companies ranked within top 20 of Korea, we collected their data through an organized questionnaire (18cases) and interviews (10cases) from July to August, 2006. The conclusions are as follows : 1) Suppliers were passive in uses of the institution, and felt a sense of burden for disputes between all of demanders, and complaints for the institution of a duty, as well as troubles for cost and technique. Also, in general they considered the existing performance items seriously, and felt the needs for its improvement, as well as a sense of burden for the expansion of new performance provisions 2) Insufficiency of social opinions, valid performance item, technical and cost problems, and less predictable standards for methods of estimation were pointed out in process of implementing the institution, focusing on, within such institution, enforcement and indication items for the institution of a duty, and indication of items, as well as properness for a way of estimation. 3) Through an awareness of supplies and their estimation, and three points totally from a problem of the institution, we should make up for institutional inertia for demanders, and it is so important problem to be solved.
社団法人日本建築学会の論文
2007-10-30

韓国の住宅性能表示制度に対する供給者の評価と課題

スポンサーリンク

概要

著者

関連論文

スポンサーリンク