ロシア第一革命と右翼([共通論題1]日露戦争とロシア第一次革命,<特集>2005年度大会)

概要

論文の詳細を見る
Russian extreme rightists regarded autocracy as a necessary condition for Russian state. But Nicholas II yielded the demand for a popularly elected legislative assembly. In a word Russian autocracy imposed restriction on itself. So Russian rightists faced the dilemma of whether to follow a new policy of autocracy or to oppose it in order to maintain autocracy. The Union of Russian People dared to positively participate in election of first and second Duma. This union published its newspaper Russkoe znamia and many pamphlets, which disseminated the Union's message to the masses. These efforts to obtain the support of people in general were inconsistent with Union's political position, which defended absolutism. Union tried to clear up this inconsistence. A few studies pointed out that the Union depended on the thought of Slavophil. But Slavophil idea "Zemskii sobor" contained some kind of liberalism, which attempted to restrict the power of absolute monarchy. The Union of Russian People always denied such a restriction of absolute power. Indeed Leaders of Union of Russian People often used Slavophil terms, I think, however, their usage of such terms did not imply their dependence on Slavophil. They took full advantage of ambiguity of Slavophil terms in order to conceal their theoretical contradiction.
2006-05-25