国連女性差別撤廃条約および選択議定書の留保に関する一考察 : 条約の実効性確保の観点から(1)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper analyzes the influence of reservations to the effectiveness of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (hereinafter referred as "CEDAW") and the Optional Protocol to this Convention (hereinafter referred as "the Optional Protocol") in guaranteeing women's human rights. Reservations to treaties allow states to join a multilateral treaty when states agree to the object and purpose of the treaty in general but find that some provisions do not comform to their domestic laws, customs, or practices. At the same time, however, reservations pose the danger of tampering with the object and purpose of treaties, especially when it comes to human rights treaties. I analyze the provisions relating to reservations both in CEDAW and the Optional Protocol, comparing those with other major human rights treaties adopted by the United Nations General Assembly. These treaties include the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 1965, the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 1984, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989. While CEDAW follows the "compatibility" principle established in Article 19 (c) of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties of 1969, it fails to provide concrete criteria of the compatibility of reservations. Then I go on to analyze reservations made to CEDAW from the perspectives of geographical distribution, settlement of disputes, and the content of the provisions.
- 桃山学院大学の論文
- 2000-12-20
著者
関連論文
- 国連女性の地位委員会(CSW)第44会期の一考察 : 女性の地位に関する個人通報を中心に
- 国連女性差別撤廃委員会(CEDAW) : 第25会期の概況
- 国連女性差別撤廃条約および選択議定書の留保に関する一考察 : 条約の実効性確保の観点から(1)
- クリントン政権の対中政策に関する事例研究 : 大統領の対議会関係を中心に(2)
- 女性差別撤廃条約選択議定書案の研究 : 国連女性の地位委員会第42-43会期の作業部会における討議を中心に
- クリントン政権の対中政策に関する事例研究 : 大統領の対議会関係を中心に(1)
- 女性労働者に関する国際文書の国内適用 : 男女雇用機会均等法の事例研究(1)