体罰法禁下における体罰正当化の論理
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Following the Meiji Restoration, corporal punishment in schools was prohibited by government ordinance in 1879. However, its definition became very vague after specific examples disappeared from the ordinance in 1890. Subsequently, a clause concerning disciplinary punishment was newly added to the ordinance. As a result, the point of view was born that violence as a disciplinary punishment would be permitted if it did not inflict any injury upon pupils. This justification of corporal punishment was supported on the one hand by the idea that the teacher was acting as substitute for parents, and on the other hand by the idea that the teacher was a governmental official who exercised authority over the people. Eventually, in the period of Showa fascism, the former idea, which had been justified by relating the teacher-child relationship to the blood relationship between parent and child, came increasingly to be replaced by the latter idea, which premised a special power relation (das besondere Gewaltverhaltnis).
- 桃山学院大学の論文
- 1993-09-30
著者
関連論文
- 文検における教職教養科目の新設とその性格(共同研究:新たな時代に向けた教職課程改革)
- 学外実習評価の傾向および評価項目の再検討(共同研究:新たな時代に向けた教職課程改革)
- 文検「公民科」の筆記問題と口述試問
- 反ナチ少年集団・エーデルヴァイス海賊団 : ヒトラー・ユーゲントとの敵対を中心に
- 体罰法禁下における体罰正当化の論理
- 就学義務違反処罰行政の形成と沖縄牝牛窃盗事件裁判
- 徳島遊動円木裁判にみる戦前公立学校の性格