現代中国における地方の教育政策過程 : 1990年代以降の公立学校の民営化実験を手がかりに
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Educational policy process in China is becoming a main subject in educational administration. Preceding researches had focus to the problems in the policy implementation. In other word, although decentralization had been advancing and it had been criticized about the relationship between central-local that the issues that needs to be address was left behind. And it was the main research purposes to offer solutions in solving the real issues between centralization and decentralization. As the analysis approach, there is little what analyzed an educational policy in the analysis framework of policy process. The paper focusing on the decision-making and the process of implementation in educational administration, and enlighten the structure and the feature of educational policy process in China. Furthermore, the paper adds the viewpoint of the relationship between central-local analyzing the task that cannot be solved only by the structure and policy pertaining in the policy process environment. This research focuses the sructure of educational policy process and the grade of the local authority discretionary rights in policy process, and the mechanism that made it possible. The following are concrete work subject. (1) Does the local authority have any power to implement it. (2) Why implementing the privatization policy what stops them from practicing it. (3) Whether the system works or not. From a privatization experiment policy, we can find that there are still possibilities of discretion in local authority. The policy process of top-down control is changed. The educational policy-making and implementation process in local authority have broad latitude in policy process. A local forms a policy is made by the local to fit actual condition in the local area. Hence jurisdiction to a compulsory education was transferred to the local authority. However, the central government set forth the opposite plan to public schools choice. The central government directed local to regulate approval and license for setting up privatization experiment schools. However, the central government did not take a decisive control action in the privatization experiment schools. Central government did not oppose school choice in privatization experiment school. Furthermore, the local authority has power over the public schools because it contributes immensely to its finances.
- 東京大学の論文
- 2004-03-10