景観設計プロセスにおける代替案選定手法に関する考察

概要

論文の詳細を見る
In the designing process of an architectural project by a team, the designers should advance the design while continuously evaluating the work and making decisions as a group about the project. There are many situations in which two or more alternative solutions are selected by designers. The design team has adopted the decision making process based on strong opinions or majority vote. These methods sometimes faster unclear decisions which are not objective, and therefore, insufficient. To solve this problem, the author proposed the selection technique for alternative design solutions, in which Analytic Hierarchy Process by Saaty was applied. The subjective judgement of each evaluator was reflected in the selection of the alternative solution. By this technique, the decision process could be represented clearly and convincing. In this research, three models of alternative selection by AHP were compared and the effectiveness of each was confirmed.
社団法人日本建築学会の論文
2000-11-30