武道家福島清三郎と石原莞爾
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Seizaburo Fukushima (1890-1950), a famous judo instructor, became involved in political activity after he met Kanji Ishihara, who was said to be the best strategist in the Japanese army. The author devised five questions to investigate why he changed and researched them using documents and firsthand accounts. Briefly, the results were as follows: 1. Fukushima was born in Kumamoto Prefecture. In 1920, after graduating from the bujutsu instructors' school he became a professor of the college of budo managed by the Dainihon Butokukai. He then became an influential budo instructor in the Kansai area and also a budo adviser at Kenkoku University in Manchukuo. 2. He was a man who practiced judo actively since his youth and was devoted to helping young people. He was impartial with his students, even with a Korean student who practiced karate, despite the racial discrimination of that era. 3. In 1936, Fukushima built a 80-mat judo training hall, the Giho-kai, where he taught students. At that time, he was an active supporter of a political movement known as the East Asia Union, under the guidance of Ishihara, despite the military police and ultra-rightists trying to suppress it. 4. He recommended his student Suguru Manda for the position of chief judo instructor at Kenkoku University and as a result had an indirect influence on the students of the judo club through Manda, because Manda sometimes invited them to his home to give them opportunities to listen to Ishihara's ideas. 5. Budo instructors generally tend to be conservative, because they are influenced by the traditional budo practice system in which great importance is attached to obedience to seniors. However, Fukushima and his friend Tatsukuma Ushijima, one of the strongest judo players of his era, became critical of their own lives and society after meeting Ishihara. Cases such as these tell us that if we attach importance to budo education in modern education, it is necessary that we try to foster a critical spirit in it, because traditionally it tends to lead to a passive acceptance of the status quo.
- 早稲田大学の論文
- 1994-03-25
著者
関連論文
- 武道家福島清三郎と石原莞爾
- 建国大学の教育と石原莞爾
- 建国大学における武道・課外活動
- 武道論とその課題
- 012 教 A03301 満洲国『建国大学研究院月報』と武道
- 11086 武道の基本構造とその教材化について
- 016 武道の特性と合気道競技の特性に関する一考察
- 01史-27-口-16 近代柔術の理論と展開 : 嘉納治五郎の「武術としての柔道」の思想(01.体育史,一般研究発表抄録)
- 01史-30-口-33 植芝盛平の「柔道対抗技」の技術分析 : 海軍大将竹下勇の覚書『坤』(1930)をもとに(01 体育史,一般研究発表抄録)