張家山漢簡「二年律令」盗律にみる磔刑の役割 : 諸侯王国を視野におく厳罰の適用
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
According to the Statute on Theft (Daolu 盗律) of the Ernian Luling Codes found in the Zhangjia Shan collection of bamboo documents, the time between the Qin 秦 Dynasty of the Warring States Period and the beginning of the Former Han 前漢 was characterized by an increase in the severity of punishment for such crimes as group robbery from hard labor to the death penalty; and it was often the case that pursuers who captured or killed felons would be rewarded with prestigious aristocratic titles, etc. These types of serious crime had two elements : one pertaining to the princedoms that existed during the period, the other to group-related behavior. The latter element, in particular, consisted of gang-related crimes that would have to be handled by military troops organized by Xian 県 and Dao 道 level administrative offices. Here, we not only observe the characteristic features of the Ernian Luling's penal code, which looked upon gang-related crime as especially dangerous, but also the intentions of the Han Dynasties to prevent gang-related crime from escalating into political rebellion and civil war. Among the Ernian Luling criminal statutes we find provisions to deal with the illegal crossing of inspection points by bands of robbers; and the Statute on Robbery states that allowing valuable goods to flow out of inspection points constitutes robbery. These statutes show that 1) under the Jun-guo 郡国 feudal system during the early years of the Former Han Dynasty, many incidents occurred of criminals crossing inspection points in the remoter Xian and Dao districts to flee into the jurisdiction of a some princedom and 2) the Ernian Luling itself was filled with new legal provisions focusing on the situation of the princedoms in the east. Although the princedoms during this time were established in order to stabilize the Dynasty's rule, they also posed a threat to it. This is why the Ernian Luling imposed more severe punishment on group-related crime within the Dynasty's jurisdiction, hoping to prevent disputes among the surrounding princedoms. The Ernian Luling provisions stayed in effect through the reign of Empress Hou 呂, but there is no doubt that the penal system it called for stemmed from the social chaos that characterized the reign of the Han Dynasty's founder.
- 2005-11-20
著者
関連論文
- 書評 飯尾秀幸著「秦・前漢初期における里の内と外--牢獄成立前史」(太田幸男・多田狷介編『中国前近代史論集』汲古書院)
- 池田雄一著, 『中国古代の律令と社会』(汲古叢書78), 汲古書院, 二〇〇八・三刊, A5, 八五二頁, 一五〇〇〇円
- 秦の城旦舂刑の特殊性--前漢文帝刑法改革のもう一つの発端
- 北宋景祐刊『漢書』刑法志第十四葉の復元--前漢文帝刑法改革詔の文字の増減をめぐって
- 張家山漢簡「二年律令」盗律にみる磔刑の役割 : 諸侯王国を視野におく厳罰の適用
- 収制度の廃止にみる前漢文帝刑法改革の発端--爵制の混乱から刑罰の破綻へ
- 戦国秦の良民の「大」「小」区分と身長六尺--未成年に科す実刑と未発達な贖制度の関係
- 出土法律文書と秦漢法制史研究 (特集/中国古代史研究の現状と課題)
- 北宋景祐刊『漢書』覆刻本の概観--形態的問題点
- 三国魏文帝の法制改革と妖言罪の弾圧--古代中国法の一分岐点
- 書評 椎名一雄著「『庶人』の語義と漢代の身分秩序」, 「漢代爵制的身分秩序の構造--『庶人』と民爵賜与の関係」
- [アジア文化研究所]第三回研究例会 曹植と丁儀--三国志の謀反人の系譜
- 書評 廣瀬薫雄「王杖木簡新考--漢代「律令学」の角度から」
- 秦漢代の徒隷と司寇 : 官署に隷属する有職刑徒
- 書評 籾山明著『中国古代訴訟制度の研究』
- 書評 水間大輔 秦律・漢律における未遂・予備・陰謀罪の処罰--張家山漢簡「二年律令」を中心に
- 書評 松崎つね子『睡虎地秦簡(すいこちしんかん)』--墓主「喜」の出自が秦人か楚人かを追究する論考と併せて
- 書評 陶安あんど著「漢魏律目考」(『法制史研究』五二号)
- 戦国秦の「徭」と軍政--睡虎地秦簡 秦律十八種「徭律」訳注
- 書評 水間大輔著「秦律・漢律における共犯の処罰原理--その歴史的変遷と思想的背景」(『法制史研究』五一号)
- 書評 冨谷至編『流沙出土の文字資料--楼蘭・尼雅(ニヤ)出土文書を中心に』