MMPIの回答に及ぼす態度の影響と妥当性尺度
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The Japanese edition of MMPI was administered twice to a group of 214 Japanese cadets. The first administration was under the usual instructional set. Two weeks later, the Ss were divided into three subgroups consisting of approximately an equal number of Ss which differed according to test-taking instructional set. Two experimental groups (favorable set group and unfavorable set group) and one control group (neutral set group) were utilized. The introduction of favorable or unfavorable set produced significant changes in the MMPI scores of testees. The K correction has not been found sufficiently valuable to in dicate the faking bad profiles. In order to test efficiency of validity indicators, it has been planned to make a comparison of the validating scores obtained from the three different set groups. The results reported in the present study indicated that the three keys (L, F, K), considered singly, are able to identify faking sets to some extent and that Hs raw score, utilized singly, was more successful in discriminating the faking good from the normal scores, but their maximum efficacy is realized in combination. The results of this study confirmed Gough's results that the F・K index has a superior value to detect a normal person who has tried to fake. In the present data, the F・K cutting score for the faking bad profiles was plus seven. This cutting score wouod correctly classify 97 per cent of the normal cases and 83 per cent of the faking bad cases. A new index-L raw score plus K raw score minus Hs (Hypochondriasis scale) raw score-was presented to detect the faking good set. The highest phi coefficient was given by a cutting score of plus 21. This cutting score would correctly classify 97 per cent of the normal cases and 90 per cent of faking good cases. The F・K index and the L+K-Hs index may be considered as efficient measures to detect malingering and test dissimulation in the MMPI.
- 日本教育心理学会の論文
- 1961-12-30
著者
関連論文
- 8-1 評価(日本教育心理学会第7回総会部門別研究発表題目・討論の概要)
- 4 測定評価 : a 人格評価1(日本教育心理学会第8回総会部門別研究発表題目・討論の概要)
- 3 測定・評価 : d 人格II(日本教育心理学会第9回総会部門別研究発表題目・討論の概要)
- 332 個人特性評価におけるSocial Desirability : SD尺度作成の試み(人格II,3.測定・評価)
- 814 EPPSの研究(その六)
- 403 児童用モーズレイ性格検査の研究(その1)(a.人格評価I,4.測定評価)
- 813 EPPSの研究(その3)(8 評価)
- 812 EPPSの研究(その2)(8 評価)
- 811 EPPSの研究(その1)(8 評価)
- 320-322 EPPSの研究(その1)
- 318 人格特性項目の望ましさと応答率(8.評価,日本教育心理学会第5回総会部門別研究発表要旨・討論の概要)
- 312 MMPIの信頼性について (日本教育心理学会第4回総会部門別研究発表要旨・討論の概要 : 7. 人格 (2))
- MMPIのIRについて : 6.カウンセリング
- MMPIの回答に及ぼす態度の影響と妥当性尺度
- MMPIに対する回答の妥当性について