一九世紀バーミンガムにおける雇用関係と議会改革運動

概要

論文の詳細を見る
Once I pointed out that the complicacy of social movements in nineteenth century England was due to the co-existence of two kinds of workers whose interests were different from each other: factory workers and domestic workers. The former had a tendency to demand the wage increase by way of organized labour movements, and the latter, on the contrary, conducted the campain for a social reform by way of political movements. I tried in this article to look into the localism of the social movements and analyzed the Political Reform Movement of 1832 as an example. I put a stress on the influence of the industrial relations Birmingham metallic industry on both the Movement and T. Attwood's economics, i.e., the leader's thought. I came to the conclusion that the paternal relation between the employers and their employees in the Birmingham metallic industry was reflected in the incompleteness of the Reform. The employees were not so awakened politically as to disclose the employers' hypocrisy. The Birmingham Political Union, therefore, had to be faded away before the appearance of the Chartist Movement.
社会経済史学会の論文
1978-11-25