<論文>集合的理想とコミュニケーション空間 : デュルケームの人格崇拝の議論から
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In his early work, De la division du travail social, Durkheim argues that the cult of the dignity of human personality will be a 'collective faith' in modern society. We would like to examine further this suggestive argument, which expands in his later writings so that we can find a clue to see more clearly difficulties which have been faced by endeavors to establish dignity of human personality as foundation of our societies. Durkheim insists that the cult of dignity of human personality will be the only 'religion' that can assure social solidarity of members of modern society, because in modern society where the division of labor is highly developping there must be nothing in common except the fact that each of them is human being and possesses the human personality, which is supposed to belong to all. In his final work, Les Formes elementaires de la vie religieuse, Durkheim argues that the very source of religion consists in the emotion of unity that members of the group experience in the communion in collective effervescence, in the course of which the sacred symbol system, religion, can be formed. From this point of view, the new 'religion', that is, the cult of dignity of human personality, will be formed in the coming effervescence which Durkheim anticipates in the conclusion of this book. This argument should be questioned on two points. The reflexive conscience, which enables one to be autonomic and make free examination, and becomes more and more important in modern societies, seems to be incompatible with the religion formed in collective effervescence. Because such a religious system, as Durkheim himself writes, can come into existence only when they are not aware of themselves : the process in which the sacred symbols are constructed. The emotion that Durkheim considers as the source of religion contains the sentiments that distinguish 'us' from others, therefore, it is contradictory to the principle of dignity of human personality. So we should look for another source of religious emotion for the new 'religion' somewhere out of collective effervescence, out of Durkheim's theory.
- 京都大学の論文
- 1997-12-25
著者
関連論文
- デュルケームとバタイユにおける力の社会学 (パースペクティブとしての--暴力・労働・贈与)
- 特集について (特集 ヒューマン・コミュニケーション--教育と研究の現場から)
- 中等教育の中の社会学 ( 周辺への/周辺からの社会学)
- 書評 松浦雄介著『記憶の不確定性--社会学的探究』
- 作田啓一著『三次元の人間-生成の思想を語る-』
- 交流の共同体と合一の共同体--バタイユとジラ-ルの供犠論の比較から
- 超越性と内奥性--デュルケームとバタイユにおける聖の概念
- 集合意識と非-知--デュルケームとバタイユにおける非個人性の次元
- 衝撃と反復 : フロイト「科学的心理学草稿」による心的外傷の考察
- 暴力と贈与 (特集 日仏学術シンポジウム社会学部門 グローバル化時代における新たな文化の生成 : 文化的多様性の理解と平和の構築) -- (文化の喧騒)
- 高校社会科教育における社会学的知の現状 -学習指導要領解説公民編「現代社会」の検討-
- 無限という病 : デュルケーム・バタイユ・ラカン理論による現代アノミーの分析
- パリ幻想と京都幻想 (2004年度第1回人間文化学会研究会発表要旨)
- 善と価値--デュルケーム宗教社会学における道徳概念の再検討
- 集合的理想とコミュニケーション空間 : デュルケームの人格崇拝の議論から
- 外的な力と内的な力 : デュルケームの集合力概念の再検討を通して
- 美から社会を学ぶ/社会から美を学ぶ -美と社会の総合学習-