<論文>日本における中国の家族・宗族研究の現状と課題

概要

論文の詳細を見る
In the 1980s' Japan, an interest against Chinese family and lineage rose again. Why I say "again"? Because their research was a prosperous time from pre 2nd World War to soon after the war. Their research since 80s is, however to resolve a deadlock of Chinese history research after the war in Japan. It was based on a class analysis to consider a production relation as an axis. They are called social economic-historical research to try seeing a historic characteristic of each time, and occupied the mainstream of research after the war. But scholars become to have doubt whether it could capture the peculiar development and social structure of Chinese history during rescet twenty years. So The research like these family and lineage appeared a task as an element to solve peculiar Chinese social structure and human relation. By a sequence of events like this, Chinese family and lineage research since 80s period concerate on after the Song period, above all Ming-Qing periods that it charges to have been a principal place of social economic-historical research after the war. Therefore, their researches on times of pre Tang Dynasty which it had been a principal stage of research as being from the pre war to soon after the war periods isn't very prosperous. It is thought that a strong point of research in recent years is the regional study to have been aimed at a specific area and that is closely related with the community theory to have become a new current of Japanese Ming-Qing periods research since 80's. Masao Mori who advocate the theory has tried to gaze at class relations through revising human relations from community level. However, in the case of Song China research in Japan, it differs with a point that receives a stimulation of the research in U.S., rather than an influence of Mori's theory, specially, Japanese young scholar. They also become to share the argument that Robert Hymes revealed in Song research. And, in recent years, the research result and theory about the Chinese southeastern inshore region (Fuiian, Guangdong) of Maurice Freedman of British social anthropologist also came actually for a large part of the progress in an regional study of these family and lineage. Though a social anthropologist like Masahisa Segawa is a matter needless to say, even historical researchers which have profound interest in the prosperous regions of lineage, the result of Freedman becomes to be not disregard it. Since 80s, though it is the Japanese family and lineage research to have restarted under a new task, it elapse only around 20 years. So an unsolved task also is greatly left. The first is an attitude against research store until now. Chinese family and lineage researches in Japan which includes an actual investigation have plenty of research store from pre the 2nd War. We doesn't digest these store yet. Secondly, a problem of family and descent gruop research can't deny to concentrate for a specific theme such as the regional study. Though Li system research that is related to it begun little by little, I think that exist many problems which was left. Thirdly, for Chinese family and lineage research, whether so-called historical demography knowledge can apply or not, we must show consideration for it.
東海大学の論文

著者

小林義廣
東海大学文学部歴史学科東洋史専攻

<論文>日本における中国の家族・宗族研究の現状と課題

スポンサーリンク

概要

著者

関連論文

スポンサーリンク