溶連菌の群別,およびA群溶連菌の型別-2-Electrosyneresis法と毛細管内沈降反応法,Bacitracin Disc法,および小林分類法の比較 (猩紅熱研究会年次報告研究資料集--1974年)

概要

論文の詳細を見る
Two hundred eighty strains of beta hemolytic streptococci isolated from patients were examined in parallel by precipitin, bacitracin. disc, Kobayashi's Methods and electrosyneresis. With both of the latter two methods, correct identification of Group A streptococci was obtained when compared with the results using the Lancefield precipitin method, and no false reaction occurred. With some variation on the different lots of same manufacturer of the bacitracin disc, 98.2% of the group A streptococci were sensitive, while 34.0% of strains of groups B, C, F, and G were sensitive.<BR>In addition, 213 strains of group A hemolytic streptococci were also typing with electrosyn.eresis as compared with Lancefield precipitin method. This identification was accurately correlated with the results obtained with the precipitin test, and 53.7% cf non-typable strains with precipitin test were typable with this method.
日本感染症学会の論文