The 'Pure Science of Education' as Ideology:The Relation between 'Science of Education' and 'Totalitarianism' in E. Krieck's Thought
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
E. Krieck was a supporter of a 'pure science of Education' as well as of the ideology of Nazism. In this paper the attempt is made to discuss the connection between these two aspects.<BR>Krieck was aligned with Nazism before he developed his theory of pure science of education; there was a reason why he supported Nazism. The reason is that this was the ideology of the petit bourgeois class.<BR>The 'pure science of education' is based on two principles. The first is the principle of the superiority of 'the whole' over the 'particular', the second is the principle of discussing being (facts) while not discussing oughtness. The 'whole' in the first principle signifies concretely speaking the national community. Furthermore, the ontological proposition ('the whole anteceds the particular'.), includes the ethical conclusion ('the particular must follow the whole'). Hence the first principle postulates the integration into the national community, i.e. the pre-existing order of rank. This is so because the national community is the only group within which the petit bourgeois exposed to oppression from above and to threat from below, can identify himself. As to the second principle, this is from the beginning destined to destroy itself because it contradicts the first principle which is an expression of faith. But the hypocritical conscience of following the second principle makes its advocate fall a prey to the illusion as if he were not speaking of a subjective faith but of objective facts. Nazism and 'pure science of education' are thus combined in Krieck's thought.
- 教育哲学会の論文
教育哲学会 | 論文
- 研究状況報告 近世教育思想史研究の方法と課題
- 教育における労働の脱規範化へ向けて--アレントによるマルクスの読みかえに着目して (課題研究 労働と教育)
- 特定課題研究助成プロジェクト報告 「現代リベラルデモクラシーにおけるシティズンシップと教育についての研究」の成果報告
- 「現代リベラルデモクラシーにおけるシティズンシップと教育」に関する総括的報告 (特定課題研究助成プロジェクト報告 現代リベラルデモクラシーにおけるシティズンシップと教育)
- 書評 宮寺晃夫著『教育の分配論--公正な能力開発とは何か』