日英語の文照応と副詞・副詞句
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper is concerned with the relationships between adverbials and sentential anaphors (e.g. <I>it, that, sore</I>, Ø), and considers whether or not an adverbial in a preceding (succeeding) sentence is included in the antecedent of a sentential anaphor.<BR>Sections 1.1 and 2.1 make clear that a sentential adverbial is always excluded from the antecedent of a sentential anaphor, as seen in (la, b).<BR>(1) a. <I>Probably</I> John will pass the exam and everyone expects it.<BR>b. <I>To my regret</I>, the man is an alcoholic, but Mary denies it.<BR>Sections 1.2 and 2.2 deal with predicate adverbials, and argue that a predicate adverbial is either included in or excluded from the antecedent of a sentential anaphor, which depends upon the context, or the speaker-hearer's pragmatic knowledge. Observe the following examples, where in (2a) suddenly is excluded from the antecedent and in (2b) it is included.<BR>(2) a. <I>Suddenly</I> Elsa jumped on the roof of the car. She liked <I>it</I>.<BR>b. <I>Suddenly</I> it began to rain, but they say <I>it</I> often occurs in this district.<BR>In 1.3 and 2.3 it is argued that a strictly subcategorized adverbial never fails to be included in the antecedent of a sentential anaphor, as seen in (3a, b).<BR>(3) a. Terry dresses <I>elegantly</I>. Everyone admires <I>it</I>.<BR>b. Rosa put her legs <I>on the desk. it</I> irritated John.
- 日本言語学会の論文
日本言語学会 | 論文
- チャック語の「いく」la[eng]と「くる」vai[eng]
- 動詞前綴の意義の組込みについて
- 書評論文 Barbara Dancygier. Conditionals and Prediction: Time, Knowledge, and Causation in Conditional Constructions
- シュメ-ル語のVentive(来辞法)とIentive(去辞法)について
- Babylonian Grammatical Textsについて