Decision-making on Transport Policy: A Comparison between Scholars and Stakeholders

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• This study proposes a hybrid MCDM model to analyze the transport policy decision-making process and the various perspectives from stakeholders and scholars are discussed in detail. DEMATEL is employed to construct NRM, ANP is adopted to evaluate the weights of criteria, and VIKOR is used to select the best transport mode. The empirical results reveal that stakeholders are most concerned about Feasibility & Execution and Political Climate. The three criteria with the strongest impact levels are Economic Development, Social Security, and Environmental Protection. Social Security, Equity & Justice, and Environmental Protection have the highest weights. The main concerns of scholars are Political Climate and Environmental Protection. The three criteria with the greatest impact are Feasibility & Execution, Equity & Justice, and Political Climate, while Social Security, Environmental Protection, and Equity & Justice have the highest weights. Railway is the best choice among the four transport modes for stakeholders and scholars.

• Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studiesの論文

著者

• CHEN Shu-Chuan

  Department of Air Transportation Management, Aletheia University

• KUO Shih-Yao

  Department of Air Transportation Management, Aletheia University

• CHANG Kuo-Wei

  Department of Leisure and Recreation Studies, Aletheia University

関連論文

• Decision-making on Transport Policy: A Comparison between Scholars and Stakeholders

スポンサーリンク