偶然得点における等確率の仮定
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The "multiple-choice" form of test, in which answer alternatives are given, has frequently met with the objection that an examinee who does not know the correct answer to the item can make a substantial score by chance success. Several methods have been proposed to correct the effect of chance success on items and test statistics. These methods are all based on certain assumptions concerning chance success, which were as follows:(1) An examinee who is ignorant of the correct answer to the item will fail in the free answer form of test, and he will choose the answer at random from the alternatives in the multiple-choice form.(2) All alternatives in an item have the equal probability of chance success, that is, the probability is the reciprocal of the number of alternatives.This study aims at investigating the validity of the above assumptions.Methods: Two parallel mathematical tests consisting of 12 items were prepared, one of which was the "control test" (free answer form), and the other was the "experimental test" of five different forms the 2-alternative form (Form A), the 3-alternative form (Form B), the 4-alternative form (Form C), the 5-alternative form (Form D), and the free answer form (Form E), These tests were given to 3rd grade pupils (N=2, 100) of some secondary schools during October and November, 1964. Ss were divided into two groups:Group 1: A control test was given in the usual way, but the experimental test was given without showing the problems and the examinees were asked to make a pure guesswork on the answer sheets.Group 2: A control and experimental tests were given in the usual way.Results: In the pure guesswork of Group 1, the percentage of response was different among alternatives and the mean score was significantly different from the chance score, contrary to the assumption of the equal probability of choice (Tables 1 and 6-7).The results of Group 2, on the other hand, did not contradict the assumption of chance success. Score obtained were compared with the estimated scores which consisted of the true score and the chance score, and good agreement was obtained. All this is probably due to the fact that the proportion of the chance score in the observed score was so small as to make the difference between the observed score and the estimated score negligible.
- 公益社団法人 日本心理学会の論文
著者
関連論文
- 9-4 臨床(日本教育心理学会第7回総会部門別研究発表題目・討論の概要)
- Q-技法による学力要因の分析 : 続報
- 942・943 中学校における反社会的生徒の研究 : 反社会的行動予測の試み
- 572 学業不振児の研究III(5教科・指導)
- 605 学業不振児に関する研究(14.学力,日本教育心理学会第5回総会部門別研究発表要旨・討論の概要)
- 634 学業不振児に関する研究(III)
- 820 教師の見た児童の行動特性[II](教授スキル,教授過程3,口頭発表)
- 651 教師の見た児童の行動特性(教授・学習6,教授・学習)
- 芝祐順著, 因子分析法, 東京大学出版会, 1972年4月刊, A5判, 424ぺージ
- 高校入試に関連した問題(現代教育評価の諸問題,シンポジアム1)
- 高校入試に関連した問題(現代教育評価の諸問題)
- Q技法による学力要因の分析
- 606 学力と教育条件 (日本教育心理学会第4回総会部門別研究発表要旨・討論の概要 : 14. 学力・学力テスト)
- 偶然得点における等確率の仮定