シュネ-デル社の成長行動と経営組織(一九一三年)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Schneider and Company, a leading industrial enterprise in France, instituted the Rules to establish principles of its internal organization in 1913. Based on these Rules, I attempt to suggest an explanation for its administrative structure on the eve of the World War I, focusing on its operating units.<BR>Schneider, like other French industrial enterprises in those days, made little use of mass-production techniques, providing nonstand-ardized goods for producers and governments. However, Schneider had a high reputation as a maker of large, precision products which required a highest level of technology at that time to be fabricated, such as locomotives, marine engines, artillery, armorplates, bridges. As most of its products were made by order and small-batch, Schneider had grown, since its establishment in 1836, by continuously diversifying its products, and by diversifying in a number of industries. According to the Rules, Schneider made industry the basis of the organization of its production units : iron mines, coal mines, pig iron and steel producing, rolling mill, machine construction, electric machine construction, field artillery, naval artillery, forging and armorplate finishing, shipbuilding, mine making, bridge and building. Each of these units had its manager as well as its accountant's and engineer's offices, and formed a separate unit of accounts. Therefore each formed the "operating unit", to use the term of professor Chandler, Jr., though many of them were in the same site, Le Creusot. Organizational imperatives at Schneider, however, showed clear differences to those at the American "modern business enterprise".As most of its products required several months or more to be accomplished, and were made by order and small batch, Schneider organized its operating units to administer individual orders from the acceptance to the deliery. Thus the unit's accounts were organized to perform estimating and recording costs of separate orders. The controller's office was also formed to apparaise the unit's performance by order. Since each of these orders formed an autonomous administrative unit, the operating units which administered them remained autonomous. Though large enterprise with more than 10, 000 employees, Schneider was composed of numerous administrative units of orders, and of autonomous operating units.<BR>Schneider did form, in Paris, headquarters and a central office headed by salaried managers, but by different ways from those at United States firms which integrated mass production with mass distribution. As Schneider's growth behavior was different from that of the American big business, its organizational growth pattern also different.
- 経営史学会の論文
著者
関連論文
- 第二帝政期フランスにおける経営パターナリズムをめぐって : 同時代の労働問題研究家の関心状況を中心として
- Methode de Calcul du Benefice et Vision Economique de l'Industriel du 19e Siecle Schneider et Cie vers 1840
- 原 輝史著, 『フランス資本主義』 : 成立と展開, 日本経済評論社、一九八六年四月、xii+四三六+三五頁、四二〇〇円
- 佐々木恒男著, 『アンリ・ファヨール』 : その人と経営戦略、そして経営の理論, 文眞堂、一九八四年九月, xvi+309p., 五〇〇〇円
- シュネ-デル社の成長行動と経営組織(一九一三年)