古代ペルシア語のいわゆる受動文について
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The Old Persian construction mana krtam had long been taken to be a passive construction. In 1952, Benveniste attempted to show that mana krtam is possessive rather than passive. This thesis, however, was challenged by G. Cardona, who maintained a return to the old passive interpretation. In the recent literature Cardonas opinion seems to be agreed among no less scholars. The present author attempts to show, on the examination of the Old Persian synchronic evidence, that Benvenistes explanation is much preferable to Cardonas.
- 社団法人 日本オリエント学会の論文