Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded with flowable composites
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This study evaluated the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to human premolars using five different combinations of flowable composites and one-step self-etching adhesives (n=12): (1) Adper Easy Bond+Filtek Supreme XT Flow; (2) Futurabond NR+Grandio Flow; (3) Clearfil S3 Bond+Clearfil Majesty Flow; (4) AdheSE One+Tetric EvoFlow; and (5) Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer+Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive. After shear bond strength testing, adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were given according to the amount of adhesive and resin remaining on the brackets. On shear bond strength, there were no statistically significant differences between Groups 2 and 4 and between Groups 3 and 5 (p>0.05). On ARI scores, the predominant ARI scores in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 5 were 4, 2, 5, and 4 respectively; in Group 4, they were 0 and 4. Results showed that some combinations of flowable composites and self-etching adhesives might not be suitable for orthodontic use due to their low shear bond strengths and high ARI scores —with the latter signaling the risk of damaging the enamel surface during debonding.
著者
-
TURGUT Melek
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University 06100
-
ATTAR Nuray
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University 06100
-
KORKMAZ Yonca
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University
-
Gokcelik Aylin
Ogretmenler Cad.
-
Korkmaz Yonca
Department Of Conservative Dentistry Faculty Of Dentistry Baskent University
-
Attar Nuray
Department Of Conservative Dentistry Faculty Of Dentistry Hacettepe University
-
Turgut Melek
Department Of Paediatric Dentistry Faculty Of Dentistry Hacettepe University
関連論文
- Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded with flowable composites
- Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded with flowable composites
- Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable restorative materials
- Comparison of three strip-type tests and two laboratory methods for salivary buffering analysis