Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In this paper, we consider the two main causation mechanisms characterizing the Marxian theory: the one running from productive forces to relations of production (Marx I) and the other moving in the opposite direction (Marx II). We argue that Marx did not achieve a satisfactory integration of the two mechanisms and that he failed to point out how multiple technological-institutional paths may stem from the cumulative interactions between relations of production and productive forces. In spite of many important analytical insights, NIE has exacerbated the primacy of technology and productive forces, which characterized "Marx I". After NIE, the analysis of the complex relations between "Marx I" and "Marx II" can still help to extend the scope of institutional theory and, in particular, its application to the comparative analysis of models of capitalism coexisting in the global economy.
- 進化経済学会の論文
進化経済学会 | 論文
- Co-evolution of Accounting Rules and Creative Accounting Instruments—The Case of a Rules-based Approach to Accounting Standard Setting
- Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics
- Analysis of Realized Volatility in Superstatistics
- A Stochastic Model for Order Book Dynamics in Online Product Markets
- Market-Wide Price Co-movement around Crashes in the Tokyo Stock Exchange