Do We Really Need to Stipulate the CED : One More Reason for Adopting the Phase Impenetrability Condition and the Copy Theory of Movement, and Thus Excluding the Constraint on Extraction Domains from the Grammar
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In this article, we would like to point out that the grammar does not need the Condition on Extraction Domains(CED)proposed in Huang (1982)as a constraint. Specifically, we will point out that the CED is only phenomenal and derivable from the Phase Impenetrability Condition (PIC)proposed in Chomsky(2000, 2001a, 2001b)under the assumption of the Copy Theory of Movement(CTM)rigidly observed. Such an analysis will not only contribute to our deeper understanding of the CED as epiphenomena but also enable the grammar to make far more articulate predictions about the extractability in extraction phenomena.
- 関東学院大学工学部教養科教室の論文
関東学院大学工学部教養科教室 | 論文
- Malcolm Cowleyの“A Portrait of Mr. Papa“を再読する
- “Hemingway"という「記憶」とAcross the River and Into the Trees
- 工学部Moodle利用報告
- Many/much vs. a lot of 序論
- 英語形容詞の配列順序(1) : コーパス検索による調査