学習者の誤用・非用をどう考えるか
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper discusses three issues on the errors and non-uses of learners: (1) How should we grasp the mechanism of errors? (2) What should we do with the reality of errors? (3) How should we consider the difference of views on errors? On the issue (1), it is claimed as follows: (4) Every error has a natural reason for why it occurred. (5) Error and non-use are two sides of a same coin; they occur as a result of the failure of acquisition of expressions in contrast. On the issue (2), it is claimed as follows: (6) Errors should be taken up positively; they tell us the points of learning rathar than bother us. (7) One cannot do without grammatical items of elementary level when expressing oneself. To improve the learners' ability of speaking (writing), a close reexamination is needed of syllabi of these items. (8) Errors which do not lead to misunderstanding should not be taken sensitively. On the issue (3), it is claimed as follows: (9) Error analysis and contrastive analysis are not overcome by the study of second language acquisition; there still remain the importance of error analysis and the significance of facts of language transfer. (10) It is important to consider what to do with learners' language instead of merely studying how it is.
- 広島大学大学院教育学研究科の論文
広島大学大学院教育学研究科 | 論文
- 運動に制限のある幼児の保育活動への参加に関する研究 : 統合保育でいかに主体的な参加を支えるか
- 社会的事象の因果の把握の困難さに対する信念が批判的思考態度に及ぼす影響
- 授業観察実習が教員志望学生の自主学習教材作成に及ぼす影響
- WBT教材作成の効果的な改善方法に関する研究--制御・プログラミング学習用「Squeak Toys」のマニュアルづくりを手がかりとして
- 平和イメージ尺度の作成