Differences in Earthquake Source and Ground Motion Characteristics between Surface and Buried Crustal Earthquakes
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In previous work, we have shown that the ground motions from crustal earthquakes that break the ground surface are weaker than the ground motions from buried faulting crustal earthquakes. In this paper, we describe differences in kinematic and dynamic source parameters that may give rise to these differences in ground motion levels. From kinematic rupture models, we show that the slip velocity of surface faulting earthquakes is less that the slip velocity of buried faulting earthquakes. From dynamic rupture models, we infer that rupture in the shallow part of fault (upper few km) is controlled by velocity strengthening, with larger slip weakening distance Dc, larger fracture energy, larger energy absorption from the crack tip, lower rupture velocity, and lower slip velocity than at greater depths on the fault. Dynamic rupture modeling using these properties results in lower ground motions for surface faulting than for buried faulting events, consistent with the observations.
著者
関連論文
- 震源と地震動における地表断層地震と地中断層地震との相違
- Differences in Earthquake Source and Ground Motion Characteristics between Surface and Buried Crustal Earthquakes
- 3-D broadband strong motion simulation in the Sendai basin during the 1998 Miyagiken-Nanbu earthquake (M_J5.0) using hybrid method
- Basin Structure Effects in the Kobe Area Inferred from the Modeling of Ground Motions from Two Aftershocks of the January 17, 1995, Hyogo-ken Nanbu Earthquake
- LESSON FROM THE 1995 HYOGO-KEN NANBU EARTHQUAKE : WHY WERE SUCH DESTRUCTIVE MOTIONS GENERATED TO BUILDINGS?
- SOURCE COMPLEXITY OF THE JANUARY 17,1995 HYOGOKEN-NAMBU EARTHQUAKE DETERMINED BY NEAR-FIELD STRONG MOTION MODELING : PRELIMINARY RESULTS