神学的思惟の倫理学的反省
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The aim of this paper is to reflect ethically on recent theological thinkings.The concept of "God" once was one of the strongest grounds to prescribe theconscious acts of man. Nowadays, God in general was "killed" by F. Nietzsche (andthat means the end of the metaphysical dualism, in which it is thought that the twoworlds--upper and lower, supernatural and natural, spiritual and material, and soforth--are in existence and the former restricts the latter). Nevertheless, God as the prescriptive ground of human acts has not been completely dead. In case of emergency at any moment and in any place He can and must come to life in our daily lives.Hence the problem of our relation with God also can be a central theme to our ethicsas a science of human acts. Undoubtedly, this theme should not be dealt so that God,not completely dead, may be ignored by radical and ethical criticism. If we can comeacross God here and now, we have no reason why our ethics should be so much "scientific"as to "kill" even such God. Of course, on this occasion, the concept of "God" itselfshould radically be reformed. And our question is as follows: Where and when canwe come across "our own God" ?As is well known to everybody this is the question that the German Protestanttheology, particularlY the existential theology in the twentieth century has been pursuing as a basic theme. Therefore in our ethics we should, first, listen modestly to the words that the existential theology tells about problems of God, and secondly, reflect on the words as much as possible from the viewpoint of our ethics which deals God as the ground to prescribe human acts, and thirdly, seek after the clues to resolve the question which we presented above.
- 秋田大学教育学部の論文
- 1981-03-00
秋田大学教育学部 | 論文
- 複合負荷運動における呼吸反応
- 無効原因又は取消原因としての行政手続の瑕疵
- 審議会の分類と設置根拠 - 審議会行政の検討 - （1）
- 行政手続法の意義の2面性について
- 秋田県における多雪年と少雪年の雪氷災害の特徴