京阪神における女子高等教育の成立事情 : 大正期の女子大学抑止政策の展開と地域における対応関係(III 投稿論文)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
During the Taisho era, although men's institutions were expanded by 'Daigaku Rei' policy, it was decided that women's higher education should be limited to the Senmon Gakko level. From the middle of the Meiji era Kobe Jogakuin and Doshisha Jogakko made plans to become colleges. In the end of the Meiji era Kyoto Koto Jogakko (Kyoto Girl's High School) had a similar plan. However, the Taisho period's policy brought all of these plans for expansion to a halt. In the Kyoto, Osaka and Kobe area, even under this policy, women's higher education still developed in interesting ways. The following three schools represent three different types of this development. 1. Kobejogakuin Daigakubu - After the 'Daigaku Rei' policy went into effect, in 1919 they set up 'Daigakubu.' 2. Doshisha Jogakko Senmon Gakubu - In 1923, Doshisha University became a co-educational university. This allowed Doshisha Jogakko Senmon Gakubu graduates to enter Doshisha University. This collaboration accomplished the goal of providing women an opportunity to get a university level education. 3. Kyoto Joshi Senmon Gakko - At the end of the Meiji era, this school made a plan to become a women's university. However, in 1919 they received a notice rejecting their proposal from the Ministry of Education. Then they decided to give up the establishment of a Kyoto Women's University. Instead they developed further as Kyoto Joshi Senmon Gakko. These three examples illustrate the three types of strategies that were used throughout Japan. Japan Women's University and Tokyo Women's University are examples of the first type. Doshisha Jogakko is the only example of the second type. Teikoku Joshi Senmon Gakko comes under the third type. In this paper I plan to use these specific examples from the Kyoto, Osaka and Kobe area to elucidate the characteristics of women's higher education during the Taisho era by taking a close look at the actual process of establishment of these schools and their educational management strategies.
- 日本教育政策学会の論文
- 1999-06-21