An Agenda for Communication Studies: A Dialogical Reading of
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The main purpose of this paper is to raise a point for discussion of communication studies by critically reading Todd Gitlin's argument, that is, the claim that we should build a common ground so that we can solve the dangerous situation called "cultural wars." We assume that the common ground Gitlin proposes is not only a space where we can pursue the ideal of a calm discussion between conflicting parties, but also a place in which we can nullify the claims of both sides enslaved by a dichotomic way of thinking. The first process of discussion is that we attempt to reveal the relationships between the Enlightenment and a monologic principle, referring to Horkheimer & Adorno and Mikhail Bakhtin. The second step is whether we can explore the possibilities of seeing a monologic concept as a matter of communication, posing an agenda for communication studies.
著者
関連論文
- ディスコース概念の再考 : Van Dijk 及び Faircloughの言説概念の検討
- A Consideration of the Concept of Hegemony in Terms of Critical Discourse Analysis Focusing on Intertextuality and Assumptions
- A Reading of New Cultural Studies: Reflecting on Theoretical Aspects of Cultural Studies
- N. Fairclough's Concept of Discourse in Terms of Articulation Theory
- An Agenda for Communication Studies: A Dialogical Reading of