A STUSY ON DIFERENCE BETWEEN CASE-BASED INSTRUCTION AND DIDACTIC INSTRUCTION ABOUT STUDENT'S WORKS PERFORMANCE OF THE EXHIBITION DESIGN
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The methods of professional teacher's panel discussion and experimental study were applied with the goal of understanding the difference between Exhibition design evaluation items and various teaching methods that inspire creativity in student's work performance. Using Exhibition design, students were divided into two groups, the experimental group and control group in which Case-based instruction and didactic instruction were given. The distinction between the two teaching methods and the influence on each evaluation item were compared. The results showed that (1) the evaluation items include design ability and creativity, the visual imagery, visual application, plane layout, display properties, entrance image, drawing presentation, and refined model should be revealed in the design ability and the entire as well as conceptual performance should be seen as a creativity; (2) Case-based instruction can strengthen visual applications, display properties, entrance image, drawing presentation and refined model; (3) the influence of design ability and creativity on the entrance image, refined model, visual imagery and plane layout can estimate the whole and concept performance. Consequently, teachers are advised to apply to improve the creative performance of students. It also provides teachers with a reference in instructing students.
- 2011-07-31
著者
-
Lu Li-shu
Graduate School Of Design National Yunlin University Of Science And Technology:department Of Digital
-
Guan Shing-sheng
Department Of Visual Communication Design National Yunlin University Of Science And Technology
-
Guan Shing-sheng
Department Of Visual Communication Design National Yunlin University Of Science & Technology
関連論文
- A STUSY ON DIFERENCE BETWEEN CASE-BASED INSTRUCTION AND DIDACTIC INSTRUCTION ABOUT STUDENT'S WORKS PERFORMANCE OF THE EXHIBITION DESIGN
- APPLICATION OF KANO MODEL IN STUDY OF SATISFACTION WITH QUALITY OF WEBSITE BROWSING ENVIRONMENT