合衆国憲法修正第十四条と州際通商条項 : その運用と連邦・州の関係,連邦と企業の問題
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Civil War marked the close of one great epoch in the U S history, and the beginning of another In the prewar years, chiefly concerning the slavery issue, the nation-state problem was completely dominant for fear that centrifugal forces would tear the nation apart In the postwar years, capitalism took the leading part Capitalism, developing at a rapid but relatively moderate tempo in the prewar years, had been given an enormous accelerating thrust by the war, was now proceeding at a pace that was unexampled in the American history So the nation-state problem of the ante-bellum period was substituted for the new nationbusiness issue in the post-bellum days The primary purpose of the adoption of the War Amendments, especially the Fourteenth Amendment, was undoubtedly to protect and elevate the rights of newly freed negroes to a plane of equality with the white people But the Amendments in their practical operations, giving no power to both Federal and States governments, were carried not to achieve the said purpose, but to guard the, interests of corporations such as railroads, "the first big business" The application of the Fourteenth Amendment marked the practical overthrow of the Congressional ideal within seven years after its adoption The Supreme Court of the U S, by annulling the original purpose of the section one of that article in the two famous cases, reduced the bill of rights to distant potentialities Such being the operation of the Amendment, the so called "Conspiracy Theory" could be nourished among students of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries The corporations and trusts now used this newly adopted Amendment, with frequently accompanied by the interstate commerce clause, Art I, Sec 8, c 3 of the U S Constitution, as powerful weapons to promote their interests When the litigations came to the Supreme Court, almost always it helped the corporations expand This trend continued to the Court or the Constitutional Revolution of 1937 Men said that the power of governments, both Federal and States, should be used to control this giant, to mitigate the harm to individual and collective welfare that it might do if left unchecked Conversely, others could say that the giant would serve the community best if it were allowed to go its own way, that the laissez faire should be watchwords of the day Thus the question of whether governments should control capitalism, and how much they should control it, moved to the center of the American political arena, i e the nation-business problem came to the fore The chief interest of the present writer is to show that how these problems-intergovernmental relationship and the nation-business problem-would properly be understood in terms of the constitutional history (mainly through the Highest Bench's judicial reviews), dealing with the Fourteenth Amendment, the interstate commerce clause, and their step-child, the "Twilight Zone"
著者
関連論文
- 合衆国憲法修正第十四条と州際通商条項 : その運用と連邦・州の関係,連邦と企業の問題
- Imperium in Imperio:アメリカ連邦主義の進化と財産権の保護--合衆国憲法批准から好感情の時代にかけて
- 二十世紀初頭アメリカにおける自由放任主義、革新主義と福祉資本主義について
- ニューディール後期の反トラスト政策 : 司法次官補・反トラスト部長サーマン・アーノルドを中心に
- シャーマン反トラスト法とその意義 : 制定百年の回顧と「スタンダード・オイル」、「アメリカン・タバコ」両判決への序章
- 世紀転換期アメリカにおける独占の台頭について : 砂糖トラスト判決を中心に
- ギルデッド・エイジにおけるプルマン・ストライキについて : ボイコット、連邦介入、州主権の問題