文の分析性について : 生成文法意味理論に基づく解釈をめぐって
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
It is well known that modern philosophical controversies on analyticity originate in Kant's argumentation. For Kant, "analytic" was meant "true by virtue of vacuous predication." However, many philosophers since Kant have misleadingly identifyed this term with "(formal) logical truth," "a priori," "necessary truth," "linguistic truth," or "truth by virtue of meaning alone" and so forth. I have a feeling that such an identification has blurred the real issue on analyticity. Quite recently, J. J. Katz, J. A. Fodor and P. M. Postal have developed a semantic theory of natural language within the framework of N. Chomsky's generative grammar. Especially, Katz defined the term "analytic sentence" as one of the semantic properties and and relations within the framework of that semantic theory. In this paper, I discuss, first, in what respects Katz's definition is significant in comparison with such techniques as R. Carnap and other logical positivists have proposed. Second, I examine whether or not Katz's definition can be expected to surmount Quine's skepticism that the analytic-synthetic dichotomy is no more than dogma. Third, I discuss to what extent Katz's definition can refute the arguments of the so-called "gradualism" which has been supported by N. Goodman, M. White and many other analytic philosophers of today. I make it clear in this paper that Katz is successful in his definition of analyticity to a considerable extent, though he has some difficulties in it.
- 慶應義塾大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 文の分析性について : 生成文法意味理論に基づく解釈をめぐって
- 文法,意味,論理の接点 : 山根和平氏「関数としての文構造」批判を中心に
- 言語・心・知識-慶應義塾大型プロジェクト 国際研究集会をふりかえって-
- 倒置指定文と有題文
- 言語的意味と表意の接点 : 「伊丹十三監督の映画がだんぜん面白くなってきた」 の曖昧性をめぐって
- 「話し手が知っている文法」の意味
- 「NPが分かる」 の曖昧性とコピュラ文
- 「A が増える」 構文と変項名詞句
- 書評 Akio Kamio:Territory of Information