認識者の様式と思惟の形式について(橋本孝先生古希記念論文集)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
橋本孝先生古希記念論文集The proposition, " Cognitio enim contingit secundum quod cognitum est in cognoscente" (S. th., I～I, q. a. 4), is well-known as one of the principal theses in the thomistic theory of cognition. Thomas considered that the thing known is in the knower according to the mode of the knower (modus cognoscentis). But it is not so clear in this proposition what the mode of the knower means in respect to human cognition. For if we interpret it as the mode of understanding (mouus intelligendi) which is the natural mode of intellect, there arise the following difficult questions. The first is whether the mode of the understanding subject who is the knower determines the mode of the thing known. The second is whether, in order to understand all other things, it is necessary that the knower apprehends his own mode of understanding prior to knowing all other things. If we considered these questions in terms of Kantian Critique, we would misinterpret them by applying a subjectivistic view to the epistemological theory of thomistic ontology which is essentially objectivistic. The present paper gives an ontological solution to these problems and makes clear what the mode of the knower's own nature means in the thomistic theory- of human cognition, by criticizing Kant's critique of the Paralogism of rational psychology in his transcendental dialectic in "The Critique of Pure Reason" and by pointing out Kant's misunderstanding of the necessary conditions for human cognition.
- 慶應義塾大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 三田哲学を語る(文学部創設百周年記念論文集I)
- 三田哲学と私(3)(文学部創設百周年記念論文集I)
- トマスにおける能動知性と抽象
- 認識者の様式と思惟の形式について(橋本孝先生古希記念論文集)
- 「受けとるもの」と「受けとられるもの」
- 感覚的認識について
- 認識の対象に関する一考察(I 哲学,慶応義塾創立百年記念論文集)