教育作用の美的理解について(下)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Among historically eminent educations and educational theorists, a thorough study reveals the existence of a common understanding regarding education, which may be characterized as "aesthetic". On the basis of this understanding, Schiller wrote his essay "Letters on the aesthetic Education of Man", and Herbart wrote "On the aesthetic Expression of the World" as a commentary to Pestalozzi's educational principle. Plato may be the first who understood education from the aesthetic point of view. One may say also that Rousseau, Pestalozzi, Schiller, Herbart, and Froebel were all among those who most impressingly expressed this aesthetic understanding of education. But it seems quite strange that this understanding has never become an object of scientific analysis, and remained a common image among those great thinkers. Therefore, I have tried in my last thesis to point out that this kind of understanding was and still is a traditional and most influential current of educational history. In this thesis, I intend to analyze the logical structure of this aesthetic understanding in a concrete way; especially with reference to the methodological characteristics of Rousseau and Plato. By way of this analysis I wish to suggest a scientific way of educational judgement and toward an educational history.
- 慶應義塾大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- ソクラテスとプラトン : プラトンの作品について教育史の立場から両者を区別する試み(III 教育,慶応義塾創立百年記念論文集)
- 『人間の権利』
- わが国初等・中等教育の問題と課題
- 社会化研究への提言
- 学校教育は社会課題にどうとりくむか
- プラトンの国家と教育(小林澄兄先生古稀記念論文集)
- 教育作用の美的理解について(下)
- 教育作用の美的理解について(上)