郵送調査の効用と可能性(<特集>世論調査方法の再検証-「総合調査学」へ向けて-)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Many mail surveys have been conducted in Japan since the 1950's. Unfortunately, their response rates have been lower than other methods of administration. Various difficulties that result from the lack of an interviewer are major contributing factors of the lower response rates. This paper provides some guidelines regarding the design of mail questionnaires, the timing of the follow-ups, and other operational details. Mail surveys can potentially achieve high response rates. Further, their response rates in rural and urban areas are very similar. In addition, the response rates of mail surveys were found to be unrelated to the educational level of the respondents. A problem of mail surveys is the omission of questions by some respondents. However, there are usually few omitted questions and the overall quality of answers is usually better. The tendency to leave unanswered some branching questions is discussed and suggestions are provided how to decrease it.
- 日本行動計量学会の論文
- 2008-03-28
著者
関連論文
- 電話調査の環境変化と手法遷移(RDD(Random Digit Dialing)法による電話調査の現状と課題,日本行動計量学会 第38大会 抄録集)
- 郵送調査の回答特性 : 謝礼・調査テーマ・調査主体が調査に及ぼす影響
- 序 : 特集にあたって
- 4.郵送調査の回答特性(特別セッション 郵送調査法-新たな時代の主力手法となりえるか-)
- 郵送調査で高回収率を得るために(35周年記念シンポジウム「社会調査の現状と課題」)
- 郵送調査の効用と可能性(世論調査方法の再検証-「総合調査学」へ向けて-)
- 「世論調査の今日的課題と対応」(社会調査の現実)
- 調査手法転換時の対応と判断 : 2000年総選挙と2001年参院選挙の事例(選挙とOR)
- 朝日新聞社の RDD 調査について(「電話調査の精度」その1)