腰痛治療の概念と成果 : 機能重視型治療vs.疼痛緩和型治療(国際招聘講演,飛躍への挑戦-アウトカムの検証-,第42回日本理学療法学術大会(新潟))
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Return to work is the primary goal in the treatment of patients with low back pain. Treatment can be prescribed on the base of a biomechanical model assuming that a physical pathologic condition leads to pain and disability. It employs a "Pain-Centered Treatment" (PCT) administering various measures of pain therapy. The biopsychosocial model acknowledges the role of psychological and social factors as well as physical factors leading to permanent disability. On the base of this model "Function-Centered treatment" (FCT) emphasizing improvement in function and not primarily pain relief were developed to facilitate return to work. It remains unclear whether treatment based on the biomedical model with its restrictive recommendations is more effective in reducing work absenteeism than treatment applying the biopsychosocial model primarily emphasizing activity. We conducted a randomized controlled trial in Switzerland in patients with sick leave due to non-specific non-acute low back pain (LBP) to evaluate the effect of three weeks of function-centered compared with pain-centered in-patient rehabilitation^<1, 2)>. Inclusion Criteria were>6 weeks out of work due to chronic non-specific LBP. 174 patients were included; mean sick leave was 6.5 months. Groups were comparable at baseline. Results FCT vs PCT: at discharge self-efficacy +5.9 points vs. -7.4 points (ES=0.55, p=0.003), lifting capacity +2.3 kgs vs. +0.2kgs (ES=0.54, p=0.004): after 3 months days at work were 25.9 vs 15.8 (E=0.36, p=0.029): after 12 month days at work were 118 vs 74 (ES=0.35, p=0.011). From these findings we can conclude that FCT is more effective than PCT for increasing work days.
- 社団法人日本理学療法士協会の論文
- 2007-12-20
著者
関連論文
- 腰痛治療の概念と成果 : 機能重視型治療vs.疼痛緩和型治療(国際招聘講演,飛躍への挑戦-アウトカムの検証-,第42回日本理学療法学術大会(新潟))
- Function-versus Pain Centred Treatment : Concepts and Outcome