出雲市知井宮多聞院遺跡出土資料の再検討I : 知井宮I式、II式土器を中心に
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper is the first part of a reexamination and a new account of materials held by Meiji University Museum, excavated at the site of the remains of Chiimiya Tamonin, Izumo city, Shimane prefecture. The remains of Chiimiya Tamonin are shell mounds dating from the Yayoi period through the Kofun period, and are some of the few remains in which the changes of relics over time can be examined stratigraphically. The excavated materials were reported and examined by Hatsue Otsuka (Otsuka 1963), and as a case example of generalization by grouping together various types of vessels as sets, it contributed to the deepening of conventional theoretical knowledge. However, various criticisms have been leveled against this speculation. One concerns the stratigraphic perception and the other concerns the chronological positioning of the set forms. There has been no reexamination of the remains aiming to see it as a whole in response to these criticisms. This paper, divided into two parts, gives a new account of the excavated materials as a whole, and reexa-mines the contents of the set strata Chiimiya I to Chiimiya IV. This first part deals with Chiimiya I and II. For the examination, each type of vessel was classified reflecting changes, and compared with the standard chronology. As a result, it became clear that there were changes in the shape of the mouth of kamegata earthenware that were inconsistent with the existing chronology. In this paper, this was judged to represent the western Izumo district phase. Furthermore, it was established that the time frame of Chiimiya I covered the mid-middle period to the first half of the late-middle period, while Chiimiya II ran from the latter half of the late-middle period to the first half of the late period. There was hardly any period of overlap between the two, and the fact that the excavated earthenware was chronologically successive also showed the legitimacy of stratigraphic perception concerning these remains. In the latter part of this paper, the remains as a whole are discussed through examination of earthenware vessels and earthen, stone, and bone/horn artifacts of phases III and IV. In addition, the validity of the phases set in this paper is planned to be examined through comparison with surrounding remains.
- 2007-03-31