ゼロリスク達成の価値におよぼすリスク削減プロセスとフレーミングの効果
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This study examined the effects of (a) the processes of risk reduction to achieve zero risk and (b) the framings of the problem on the value of achieving zero risk. Respondents assessed WTPs (willingness to pay) to save lives in a hypothetical earthquake. two factors were manipulated in the experiment. These were (1) the process to present risk reduction as an increase in lives saved or a decrease in deaths. The results suggested that the zero risk effect, which meant the identical loss reduction by a protective action against risk was valued more highly when it achieved the "no loss" outcome than when it left some losses, disappeared in the condition where zero risk was achieved by one-to-one actions with corresponding one-to-one costs. rather, people valued the first protective action more highly than the following actions in that condition, particularly when the problem was framed positively. Zero risk effect appeared only in the condition where a single-shot action could achieve zero risk.
- 日本社会心理学会の論文
- 1999-02-28
著者
関連論文
- "Decision Research"について
- 放射線の発ガンリスクにおける閾値の判断と原子力発電所に対する態度との関連
- 閾値の問題をめぐる社会心理的アプローチ
- ゼロリスク達成の価値におよぼすリスク削減プロセスとフレーミングの効果
- 佐々木土師二(著), 『旅行者行動の心理学』, 2000年, 関西大学出版部