カントとヘーゲルにおける主観的美と客観的美

概要

論文の詳細を見る
The aim of this paper is to examine comparative thought on aesthetics, especially on the being structure of beauty. The primary perspectives referenced in this comparison are from Kant and Hegel. There is a similarity between Kant's theory and Hegel's; that being the same purpose of beauty. They insist that the purpose of beauty is the realization of harmony with nature on common ground. But the difference between the two theories is based on variations of comprehension on the structure of being. Kant insists that being corresponds to forms of knowledge. Hegel posits that being means universal entirety. This difference affects how beauty exists, and how one realizes beauty. Here, I do not assert which is the better ideology, because beauty is the totality of many phases. We must select from a lot of ways of thinking under many different circumstances. We could indicate that the concepts of Husserl's phenomenological method contain available research tenets of these relative thoughts.
福岡歯科大学学会の論文
2006-12-25