二十世紀末日本の"人文科学"界に起きた"パラダイム・シフト"をめぐって

概要

論文の詳細を見る
The writer has until now put his ideas about the following three articles based the native Yamaguchi daimyo (or feudal lord) Ouchi in order: 1) A New Approach to Bocho-ology or Comprehensive Study of Yamaguchi … a consideration of Ouchi's ancient folk seen through Ouchi's Rise and Falll … (Bulletin of the Faculty of International Studies, Yamaguchi Prefectural University, No.3, 1997); 2) A New Approach to Bocho-ology (A Sequel) (ibid., No.8, 2002); 3) Distorted Ancient History … A Fabrication of History by the whole Society of Japanese History … (ibid., No.11, 2005). The above are officially those of the Ouchi, but to tell the truth, are those referred to first in the academic circle over "paradigm shift occurred in the circle of the humanities toward the end of the 20^<th> century Japan" through what is said "Kyushu Era Name", which is seen in partial data describing the oral tradition of the Ouchi Family. The present article describes problems to be derived further, based on the above ones. The problems to be derived are: 1) What is "paradigm shift"?, 2) Of "paradigm shift" occurred in the circle of the humanities of Japan, 3) Of the problem of the dispatch of Japanese Envoys in 607 to Sui Dynasty China, 4) Of the use of era name and of what the first proclamation of Taiho means, and of the "Kyushu" era name, and 5) deriving problems.
山口県立大学の論文
2006-03-07