大庄屋・庄屋の手限仕置に関する基礎的考察

概要

論文の詳細を見る
Tekagiri-shioki done by Great Village Headmen and Normal Village Headmen on behalf of jurisdiction of feudal lords, that is to say, Tekagiri-shioki executed by Great Village Headmen and Normal Village Headmen, are an item to present important point of argument in considering the relationship between law/justice of feudal lords and law/sanction of village people. There is a big difference between the two; Even though punishments are executed in the villages in the same way, Tekagiri-shioki executed by big village headmen and normal village headmen are based on the legal force of jurisdiction of feudal lords, while sanctions by village people are based on agreement among community people in its legal force. In consideration of the study situation that most of actual conditions of execution such as the relation with the judicial system of feudal province, disposal ability of Great Village Headmen and Normal Village Headmen, etc. have not been clarified yet, in this report, I would like to clarify the actual situation of Tekagiri-shioki executed by Great Village Headmen and Normal Village Headmen in Kurume feudal province in the latter period of modern times in this report. According to the regulations of the feudal province, Great Village Headmen and Normal Village Headmen could confine the villagers in the granary on their own judgment in order to castigate the villagers who hinder the management of the village. These punishments for crackdown had been executed not only by big village headmen and normal village headmen, but also by Kohrikata with their Tekagirishioki and related also with the judicial systems in feudal province. Tekagirishioki executed by big village headmen and normal village headmen in accompany with crackdown were set up in its same gradable procedures as those to dispose various cases by feudal provinces, until punishment was executed. Analysis of processes of disposals in accompany with crackdown could clarify that big village headmen and normal village headmen had already established the system enable to solve any problems in the villages, being fully equipped with a circuit to collect information on problematic conducts, accredit factual mutual relation and make decisions on disposition, on the basis of their administrative cohesiveness in the villages. I can point out those facts that Tekagiri-shioki executed by the public officer Great Village Headmen and Normal Village Headmen had had a close relationship with management by the villages, Great Village Headmen and Normal Village Headmen could execute punishment on their own judgment as Tekagiri-shioki, but could not execute punishment freely on their individual will.
2005-03-31

大庄屋・庄屋の手限仕置に関する基礎的考察

スポンサーリンク

概要

著者

関連論文

スポンサーリンク