水俣病事件における食品衛生法と憲法
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
On October 15, 2004 the Supreme Court ruling was issued in the Minamata Disease Kansai Lawsuit. It can be said to be a victory for the plaintiffs generally. The court approved the plaintiffs' assertion that the government had been responsible for regulation of wastewater and for relief of the victim (certification of pollution-related patients who were not yet identified at the time). However, a problem still remains because the defendant's (the national government's) claim concerning regulation of food (fish and seafood) was acknowledged by the court. There is much doubt regarding the decision of the national government and the Kumamoto Prefectural government not to apply the food sanitation law to the Minamata Disease case in 1957. It is considered one of the reasons for the Minamata Disease having spread widely. Application of the food sanitation law became controversial as well as in the case of the Kanemi Rice Oil (PCBs and PCDFs) food poisoning. If the food sanitation law was disregarded in those cases, we can say that the Constitution, on which the law was founded, was also disregarded. The Minamata disease has already been accepted in society as an environmental pollution problem, but viewing the Minamata disease as food poisoning should be established in the world of medicine as well as among common citizens.
- 長崎大学の論文
- 2006-02-01
著者
関連論文
- 3章 生活環境保全のためのダイオキシン耐容摂取量(III部 生活環境)
- 水俣病事件における食品衛生法と憲法
- 尾関周二編『エコフィロソフィーの現在 : 自然と人間の対立をこえて』(大月書店2001年)
- 持続可能な社会と環境正義
- 環境研究と平和研究
- 地域通信諫早など九州各地の廃棄物紛争