自己準拠的であることの不安 : 社会運動研究の困難と文化要因
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Resource mobilization approach (RMA) has bee dominant paradigm in social movement studies since 1970s. The approach is mainly interested in dynamics of social movements and conflict, so there are many theoretical and research questions that can studied without talking about nature of issues or conflicts. I think that recently some researchers in the discipline feel greater anxiety about this deficiency, through examining a debate on the methods of using cultural factors/concepts in "Mobilization" (vol.5). They may have expected the cultural or social psychological factors, that had been brought back into social movement study since the latter half of 1980s, to make up the deficiency. RMA, however, is basically self-referential and increasingly becomes "self-contained community", then new factors/concepts have not neccessarily made the researchers possible to deal with the extraneous agenda, namely, issue analysis. So must we move to new paradigm? Certainly moving may be good choice. As Buechler [1993] suggest, RMA was the theoretical response to the socio-political climate of the 1960s. But I explore the possibility for issue analysis by configuring frame/cultural resonance analysis. Through analyzing the dynamics of movements and conflicts in the way which attaches much importance to relation between movements discourse and cultural emviroments, we will acquire the findings about each issue which are indigenous to social movement study.
- 静岡大学の論文
- 2002-01-31