Another Explanation of Our Contribution Function (CFI) by Our previously proposed General Perturbation Method for the Observed Perturbation of Intensity

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• We try to explain validity of our previously proposed Contribution Function (hereafter.CFI) (Y. Ito, 1988) by our Perturbation Method for observed Intensity I (0), (Y. Ito, 1997), which was also previously proposed in order to get the exact and general solution of observed perturbation of intensity, δI(0). Our Contribution Function (CFI) has important essential problem, that is, how to understand the significance of integral of our Contribution Function (CFI) being not equal to observed Intensity I (0), pointed out by the late Professor emeritus Juichi Hitotsuyanagi (1987). In later paper (Y. Ito, 2003), to explain this we define new ContributionFunction (hereafter.CFII), and we have shown integral of new Contribution Function (CFII) is capable of being not equal to observed Intensity I(0). But, CFII is slightly different with CFI. So, we must re-examine this problem, concerning our original Contribution Function (CFI). This is another problem of this paper.

• 秋田大学の論文
• 2004-03-31

著者

• Ito Yutaka

  Natural And Enviromental Sciences Fuculty Of Education And Human Studies A Kita University

• 伊藤 胖

  Natural and Enviromental Sciences, Fuculty of Education and Human Studies, A kita University

関連論文

• Another Explanation of Our Contribution Function (CFI) by Our previously proposed General Perturbation Method for the Observed Perturbation of Intensity

スポンサーリンク