文明衝突論批判-商品交換による人類的分業を見ないハンチントン説
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Professor Huntington's theory of the clash of civilizations is based on the ideas that mankind is split into some parts according to different civilizations and that there is no factor to combine the parts. He seems not to understand that commodity-exchange is a strong combining factor. Commodity-exchanges which mediate the division of labuor among people of different families are connectors to form human society. They have necessarily spread over the world by the power of great profits they give. The more exchanges among people develop, the more antagonistic relations get restrained, and the more confrontations among nations and states become relaxed. The greatest factor which causes dangerous clashes is not the differences of civilizations but communism that abolishes commodity-exchanges. Communist forces destroy human society by abolishing market and also attack all religions and civilizations other than communism. Though Huntington himself says that the most important element which defines civilizations is religion, he is mistaken to think that the conflict between communism and liberal democracy is "only a fleeting and superficial historical phenomenon compared to the……conflictual relation between Islam and Christianity." His proposition that America should accept China's domination in Asia inclusive of Japan in order to maintain Western countries' security and prosperity is based on the above-mentioned shortsighted outlook on the human history. Being guided by this proposition, America will decline in the long run.
- 2004-03-31
著者
関連論文
- 文明衝突論批判-商品交換による人類的分業を見ないハンチントン説
- アダム・スミスの土地観の批判(岸田理教授退職記念号)
- 貨幣の本質と世界貨幣 : 未来の貨幣像
- マルクスの中世的農業観と地代論 (吉田茂芳教授退職記念号)
- 経済学的自然観と階級論との関係 : 学説史の考察(下)
- 経済学的自然観と階級論との関係 : 学説史の考察
- リカ-ドウの自然観 : 自然的動因説と労働価値説との合成物
- ジャン・バティスト・セーの自然的生産動論-マルクスの自然観の根源-
- 資金、企業家および経営者 : マルクス理論およびシュムペーター理論の難点
- 貨幣の金と 国家からの離脱 : マルクス貨幣論批判
- 労働者階級窮乏化説批判
- 剰余価値説批判