登山事故判例の分析
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In recent years, trials based on accidents involving mountaineering have been increasing. The reason for this increase is apparently a change in people's awareness of their rights as well as a change in people's former view that mountaineering is a sanctuary protected from lawsuits. A common form of trial is a civil action for damages connected with accidental death through mountaineering. In addition to such actions, there are a few trials dealing with the criminal liability of leaders towards members. In dealing with a negligence action between leaders and members,a court will consider the factors of obligation, due care, and foreseeability of the accident. The leader is subject to the obligation of guarding against reasonably foreseeable risks. The level of care required of the leader varies according to the age, skill level, and ability of the members and the danger or difficulty of the mountaineering.
- 早稲田大学の論文
- 1989-03-25
著者
関連論文
- 登山事故をめぐる当事者関係と法的責任
- スポーツ権と第三者効力
- 国のスポーツ施設整備義務
- 登山事故判例の分析
- 体育・スポーツ事故に関する判例の動向分析
- 専門職としての「体育」の多角的検討体育における専門性の法的根拠
- 必修科目と選択科目の立場と条件 : 法学的立場から
- 001110 憲法上より見たスポーツ権(0.体育原理,一般研究A)
- 009 スポーツ関係団体・組織の民間公益法人化とその問題点(0.体育原理,一般研究)
- 021 公金の支出と社会体育
- 017 国家賠償法と社会体育
- 022 体育・スポーツ権とスポーツ振興法