二〇〇三年衆議院総選挙におけるマニフェストを巡る諸問題について
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
One of the big topics was a manifesto in the general election for the House of Representatives held in 2003. The former platform was changed to a concept of the Manifesto by specifying the time limit and fiscal resources, and the political parties were expected to fight over with their manifesto in the election. Eventually, the opposition party (Democratic Party) responded to the request of the voters but the Liberal-Democratic Party was not positively responded to the request at the general election of 2003. It can be said that the possibility to a real policy election was shown here. There must have had some incompetent descriptions of the manifesto. But some problems related to the basis of the manifesto were shown in the election. In this article, three problems are examind, such as the manifesto and coalition government, Election Act and the manifesto, the House of Councilors and the manifesto.
- 日本法政学会の論文
- 2005-11-15
日本法政学会 | 論文
- 任意後見の濫用防止とセーフガード : 英国における「ベスト・インタレスト」尊重の取り組み
- 『戦後社会保障制度における生存権保障の一波紋』 : 堀木訴訟控訴審判決における憲法二五条一項・二項分離解釈論
- 二〇〇三年衆議院総選挙におけるマニフェストを巡る諸問題について
- シンポジウム 「家族の変貌と暴力」(シンポジウム2)
- ドイツにおける「親権」の最近の動向 : 懲戒権と児童虐待の視点から