P2Pの憲法学的考察 : グロックスター連邦最高裁判決を受けて
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Grokster case was decided in June, 2005. Before this case, at Boalt Hall, Berkeley, School of Law, there were two arguments over the prevention of the direct and indirect infringement of copyright. One is argued by Professor Pamela Samuelson who proposes the solution by Congress. The other is Professor Peter Menell who proposes the solution by Judiciary. They think Sony Beta case differently, which was decided in 1985. In face of this battle, the Supreme Court took the middle approach and clarified what indirect infringement is. Although this case is going to be analyzed by other distinguished scholars, it is important to say that the American scholars recognize that this P2P issue includes interpretation issue of Constitutional law. However, unlike the U.S., there are not so many arguments in Japan that discuss Constitutional law issue about P2P. In this article, I like to discuss this issue focusing on the interpretation and the battle between Congress and Judicial approach. The main point is that P2P issue includes the First Amendment rights of the technology inventor, the sender of the information and the copyright holder. Unless the explanation how to solve the P2P by the government, the balance of these three shall not be kept.
- 日本法政学会の論文
- 2005-11-15
著者
関連論文
- 児童***と***規制に関する若干の憲法学的考察
- 口腔癌後発リンパ節転移に対する早期診断
- 肩甲舌骨筋症候群例
- ネット上の不特定多数者に対する情報発信についてのブランデンバーグテストの批判的考察
- 舌正中離断を行って摘出した巨大な口腔底類皮嚢胞の1例
- 良性疾患に対する顎下腺摘出術における顔面神経下顎縁枝の処理法
- human T cell leukemia cell line における caveolin の発現についての検討
- ウィリアム・Aフレッチャー「アメリカ連邦憲法上の第一修正の保護について」
- ウィリアム・A・フレッチャー裁判官 : アメリカ司法部の構成と裁判官の任命
- 選挙活動と表現の自由に関する考察 : 2010年シティズンユナイテッド判決を中心に