VARIATIONAL AND TRADITIONAL RIGOROUS SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES : COMPARISON OF SAFETY FACTORS

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• The main objective of this paper is to compare safety factors obtained from Morgenstern-Price, Janbu and Spencer methods with the factors calculated from the modified variational approach (Leshchinsky and Huang, 1992a). Such comparison is essential since there is no mathematical proof that the variational analysis indeed yields a minimum and thus, physically produce significant results. The safety factors compared well, indicating the variational analysis is on a par with acceptable existing rigorous methods. Availability of a user-friendly computer code may make the variational analysis useful to practicing engineers. However, its greatest potential at the moment is in 3-D applications; i.e., unlike other methods, its extension to 3-D is straightforward.

• 社団法人地盤工学会の論文
• 1993-09-15

著者

• Leshchinsky Dov

  Dept. Of Civil Eng. University Of Delaware

• CHOWDHURY SABINA

  Dept. of Civil Eng., University of Delaware

• Chowdhury Sabina

  Dept. Of Civil Eng. University Of Delaware

関連論文

• VARIATIONAL AND TRADITIONAL RIGOROUS SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES : COMPARISON OF SAFETY FACTORS

スポンサーリンク