フランスにおける民事責任 : 医療過誤を中心とした比較法的考察
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Important Point 1. Negligence Although intentional neglience(faute intentionelle) is discriminated from unintentional negligence(faute non intentionelle) in France, it would hardly be significant to study if this discrimination is applicable under Japanese Civil Law Act. 2. Non-fulfillment of obligation The French law regards liability by medical malpractice as liability arising from non-fulfuillment of obligation. Unlike the Japanese law which usually grasps liability by medical malpractice as that by illegal act, the French view strongly supports my theory. However, the issue of the specific property and why most cases can settled as liability by non-fulillment of obligation in France should be studied. 3. Selection of Patients The U. S. A. and France allow doctors to select patients. Under those circumstances, though the patients who may meet the demand of doctors can obtain treatment, those who do not are forced to visit doctors one after another so that curable diseases of them may not be cured. Especially, doctors are even allowed to select emergency cases in France. This would have caused a serious problem if it weren't for governmental methods of relieving patients, but it appears things go well in that country where the social security system is established. 4. Consent In the course of medical treatment which is commenced based on the existence of a medical contract, the patients' consent is required in employing new drugs or surgical methods, especially strictly in the U. S. A. and France. The fact that patients' consent held great weight in recent judgments in Japan is significant in that such Judgments attach importance to patients' discretion.
- 日本法政学会の論文
- 1982-05-20
日本法政学会 | 論文
- 任意後見の濫用防止とセーフガード : 英国における「ベスト・インタレスト」尊重の取り組み
- 『戦後社会保障制度における生存権保障の一波紋』 : 堀木訴訟控訴審判決における憲法二五条一項・二項分離解釈論
- 二〇〇三年衆議院総選挙におけるマニフェストを巡る諸問題について
- シンポジウム 「家族の変貌と暴力」(シンポジウム2)
- ドイツにおける「親権」の最近の動向 : 懲戒権と児童虐待の視点から